So many articles written by what seem to be intelligent people and so many opinions on the good vs. evil, right vs. wrong, is it sustainable or not.
We hear about offshoring being the new thing, we hear about salaries being driven down in the US, then we hear about baby-boomers retiring and the lack of workers will drive up salaries for the good, ones, but if there is lack of talent does that fuel the offshoring fire?
Ugh.
I confess, I don’t know nor yet have an educated enough opinion. Here is what I do know, if you are a tech person you really need to learn some business skills and vice versa.
Now that you feel enlightened by my simple theory here is some rhetoric from “experts”, or so they seem to think.
In this corner wearing blue trunks we have a study from McKinsey Global Institute written about in Inc.com. It says that by 2008 4.1 million service-side jobs will be outsrouced. They then mention 4.1 is out of 160 million. I grant that the study says 13% of IT jobs will be affected but I come back to how large in terms of % is the baby boomers in IT?
In this corner wearing green trunks we have an article from Outsourcing Journal questioning if offshoring is sustainable. While Indian firms margins are around 20% they are starting to deal with wage inflation and attrition. There answer to this is very similar to US firms years ago. They are locating offices to Tier 2 locations and reviewing business models.
In this corner wearing white trunks we have this Wall Street Journal article saying that projects are getting sent overseas to save money and time. Much of the work is automation and testing of the technology.
We then have a corner wearing red, whit and blue trunks, (getting the analogy yet?) from VNU Network in the UK. Prudential after benchmarking a data center deal with Cap Gemini is bringing the operation back in house. A consultant from Deloitte is quoted as saying some companies are realizing deals should never have been done in the first place.
Finally in the same corner we have this article from Legal Week. In an effort to keep tax dollars and jobs at home US state and federal laws are being passed limiting the amount and kind of outsourcing/offshoring that can be done. It will be interesting to see how these laws stand up to constitutional tests as stated in the article.
Moral to this story? I am not sure I have one. Maybe that common sense needs to be on the front burner when thinking about security, costs, time, etc.
How I Became A Headhunter, What's Next
Over the years my firm, e-Strategies Group, Inc., has morphed a few times in the services it has provided. While perm placements in IT have always been at the center of the business we have changed as the market has changed.
In the early days we helped our clients with job fairs and responses from newspaper and web ads. It gave us the ability to establish credibility, learn what the hiring managers wanted, learn the culture, and establish a personal relationship. When job fairs and ads were not producing the right candidates for a particular job we would get an exclusive on the position.
This was a win-win for both our clients and us.
After the dot-com bubble burst we continued to do perm placements but now they were splits with other recruiting firms. Much of the business was us supplying the candidates to our partners and their job orders.
Post 9-11 we started focusing less time on splits and more on project work while doing our own perm work. During this time we found many of our recruiting partners, and a couple of our own recruiters, leave the business. Project work was a way to build recurring revenue even though the margins were pretty slim.
In the last two years we have seen levels return to what I believe are “normal”. Not the hype of the late 90’s and not the recession of 2001. But “normal”.
I have always had office space of my own, as I need a place to go to work. At home I am easily distracted and while some are more productive at home, I am much less.
I started a conversation with what I have called our “loose confederation of recruiters” about a year ago. I wanted to get everyone in the office working together with central operations. Many have resisted a more formalized system.
I made a choice.
e-Strategies Group is undergoing a makeover. Literally. I have pulled down the web site, and have started a re-design. A name search is underway with my attorney. e-Strategies Group does not really say what I do or who I am.
This blog, MN Headhunter that I started in May, was the start of the re-branding.
The sub-lease on my office space is coming to an end in September and I am choosing between two new locations. One in the Warehouse District next to Downtown Minneapolis and the other blocks away from the University of Minnesota.
I should have the work on the new company name, marketing materials, and office space completed by October 1.
My clients and candidates have been very supportive of this decision and many have responded with critical and positive feedback on the plan.
Over the next year I am going to reach out to recruiters, researchers, and admins I have met over the years and see who is interested in being part of a search firm modeled after the way many law firms operate. After the first of the year I will begin searching for office space that will put us all under one rough and one operation in November of ’06.
In the mean time I will be focusing on strengthening my relationships with my current clients and marketing to new ones. The focus will only be on perm and contract IT positions. I would prefer to work on the positions that current vendors are not filling. Either because they are not “cool” enough or the ones that are really hard to fill.
My belief has always been that a Headhunter should only be paid a fee for a search that the client itself could not do. Basically I want to be the guy, soon to be firm, that a company calls to find the right person to fill a critical position.
Being one of many on a vendor list and being forced to use the job boards to quick fill a position at a low fee or slim margin is not what I am looking for. I am looking to fill positions that a client truly sees value in paying a Headhunter to fill.
I will continue to work with student groups at the University of Minnesota by way of my seminar on how to do a job search.
I will spend quite a bit of time getting the word out to non-profits in the area aware that I have created a sister blog to MN Headhunter, www.mn_headhunter.typepad.com/vol. Here groups can post their technology needs and volunteers from the tech community and contact them directly to help out.
So that’s the past, present, and a plan for the future.
Time to get to work…
Posted at 12:33 PM in Commentary | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)